Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

General auto enthusiast topics...

Moderators: RichardA, DEALER1, Prin

Post Reply
User avatar
vehicular
I absolutely have no life
Posts: 12609
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:10 pm

Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by vehicular » Sun Dec 22, 2019 1:24 pm

I haven't bought a wideband O2 sensor controller since the Innovate LC1 came out. There are a half dozen options I'm seeing people using now including the AEM X Series, Innovate LC2/ MTX-L/ MTX-AL/ MTX-L+, 14point7 Spartan, and PLX SM-AFR. I need to feed data to an MSPNP Gen 2 in an E30.

Are there any actual differences between the controllers that use an LSU 4.9 sensor? I can't find any actual output timing data to compare the "fast" controllers (AEM X Series and Innovate MTX-L+) to the "slow" controllers. Do you still have to free air calibrate the Innovate controllers? Somebody help.
Last edited by vehicular on Tue Dec 24, 2019 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hodgdon Extreme
Jr. Postwhore
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:32 pm

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by Hodgdon Extreme » Mon Dec 23, 2019 11:46 am

There is a lot that goes into the controller circuit to correctly heat the pumping cell. Cheaper ones still do not do it as well as better ones.

IMO, this is the best unit I'm aware of for the money. The control circuit is by ECM, the industry standard for Laboratory use.

https://www.bmotorsports.com/shop/produ ... 79sv29i4n7

Also IMO, the NTK sensor is a worthwhile upgrade because the sensors tend to last longer. The LSU4.9 aint bad, though.

User avatar
vehicular
I absolutely have no life
Posts: 12609
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:10 pm

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by vehicular » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:18 pm

What does a Ballenger get you over an Innovate or AEM contoller? Accuracy? Signal processing speed? Reliability?

Where can I find data on sensor reliability/ accuracy/ etc?

User avatar
Hodgdon Extreme
Jr. Postwhore
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:32 pm

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by Hodgdon Extreme » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:39 pm

Frankly, I don't know. I've used PLX, AEM, Innovate, Ballenger and others to good effect. Never knowingly had an issue with any of them.

However, engine testing labs spend thousands to buy either ETAS or more commonly the ECM controllers.

Considering the price for the AFR500 by Ballenger is pretty typical, I think fact ECM is responsible for the control circuit makes it a great choice. Only thing it lacks is a CAN interface, which is starting to become a pretty nice/important feature. However, if your ECU is happy with the analog 0-5V output from the Ballenger, it's a solid choice.

User avatar
vehicular
I absolutely have no life
Posts: 12609
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:10 pm

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by vehicular » Tue Dec 24, 2019 1:20 pm

These guys show actual data logs between teh AEM X Series, and some of the older controllers (Innovate LC2 and PLX SM-AFR Gen4). AEM also claims to be able to keep sensors alive longer.

http://speed.academy/aem-x-series-wideb ... confirmed/

The only other consideration for me at this point is that the PLX Gen 5 claims to be able to show sensor response speed and a health reading. There's no way to know if that reading has any value, but it's something. The PLX also has a pretty big box I would have to stuff under the dash some place vs the AEM containing everything in a (ugly) gauge or a smallish cable mounted box.

User avatar
mittens
Motorboating Son of a Bitch
Posts: 18281
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Slaping the keyboard with my mittens

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by mittens » Mon Jan 06, 2020 4:03 pm

I have a innovative PBS-1 on my ski.

Wide band and boost. Love it for what it is and it has boost high record.
2007 C6 Z06 Corvette, (Heads/Cam/Blower 6psi/Headers/lowered)
2007 Chevy 2500HD (5” strait pipe, Tuned, Deleted & Lifted on 22X12 & 35s)
2002 Sea Ray 340 Sundancer (SouthsideAppartment)
2016 Yamaha FZ (17.0psi @ 9110 rpms & 91 mph)
2004 Big Dog Chopper (Custom)

User avatar
chevy408
I donated to hsvracing.com!
Posts: 6147
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:24 pm

Re: Which is the correct wideband controller/ gauge in 2019/2020?

Post by chevy408 » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:20 am

Here is an article if anyone cares to read about widebands:
https://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tech/ ... TV-DghzrVw

edit - well, after actually reading the article it doesn't help with specific wideband controllers, but it does help explain why EVERYBODY with a large cam and no cats complains about it smelling and "running rich". A vehicle running an OEM computer will be in closed loop at idle and cruise. The ECM is controlling AFR based on feedback from the O2 sensors. Once you increase valve overlap with a larger cam then you have to delay injector timing so fresh fuel isn't being added while the exhaust valve is not yet closed. But not matter how much you pull fuel from the base tables, the ECM will add back using short & long term fuel trims based on O2 sensor feedback. It is possible to force Open Loop at idle, but then you loose corrections for atmospheric changes. So we live with smelly exhaust at idle unless you retain the cat converter.

For the record, I still use 10 year old Innovate LM-1 and LC-2 wideband controllers.

Post Reply